Resonancia de estrés con dipiridamol: experiencia en el Hospital Metropolitan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47464/MetroCiencia/vol32/1/2024/46-54Palabras clave:
resonancia de estrés, dipiridamol, cardiopatía isquémicaResumen
Los métodos de imagen tienen un papel fundamental en el manejo de los pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica conocida o sospechada, al mejorar la precisión en la selección del paciente que se enviará a revascularización. Se seleccionaron treinta y cuatro pacientes con sospecha de cardiopatía isquémica para la realización de resonancia de estrés con dipiridamol para mejorar la precisión diagnóstica. A los pacientes en quienes la resonancia de estrés fue positiva, se sugirió la realización de un procedimiento invasivo y se revascularizó de acuerdo al porcentaje de isquemia confirmado en el cateterismo cardíaco. Durante el procedimiento no se presentaron complicaciones. El objetivo de este estudio fue el de incentivar a los cardiólogos a la realización de este procedimiento demostrando los resultados obtenidos en este centro. Este es el primer hospital en el país en introducir y realizar esta metodología de imagen para el diagnóstico y manejo eficiente de pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica.
Descargas
Citas
Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, Prescott E, Storey RF, Deaton C, Cuisset T, Agewall S, Dickstein K, Edvardsen T, Escaned J, Gersh BJ, Svitil P, Gilard M, Hasdai D, Hatala R, Mahfoud F, Masip J, Muneretto C, Valgimigli M, Achenbach S, Bax JJ; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2020 Nov 21;41(44):4242. PMID: 31504439.
Hoffmann U, Ferencik M, Udelson JE, Picard MH, Truong QA, Patel MR, Huang M, Pencina M, Mark DB, Heitner JF, Fordyce CB, Pellikka PA, Tardif JC, Budoff M, Nahhas G, Chow B, Kosinski AS, Lee KL, Douglas PS; PROMISE Investigators. Prognostic Value of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Testing in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights From the PROMISE Trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain). Circulation. 2017 Jun 13;135(24):2320-2332. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024360. Epub 2017 Apr 7. PMID: 28389572; PMCID: PMC5946057.
Yao SS, Rozanski A. Principales usos de la gammagrafía de perfusión miocárdica en el tratamiento de pacientes con enfermedad arterial coronaria conocida o sospechada. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2001; 43 : 281-302.
Heydari B, Jerosch-Herold M, Kwong RY. Assessment of myocardial ischemia with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2011; 54 (3): 191-2Zoghbi GJ, Iskandrian AE. Selective adenosine agonists and myocardial perfusion imaging. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2012; 19: 126-141.
Zoghbi GJ, Iskandrian AE. Selective adenosine agonists and myocardial perfusion imaging. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2012; 19: 126-141.
Bruder O, Wagner A, Lombardi M, Schwitter J, van Rossum A, Pilz G, Nothnagel D, Steen H, Petersen S, Nagel E, Prasad S, Schumm J, Greulich S, Cagnolo A, Monney P, Deluigi CC, Dill T, Frank H, Sabin G, Schneider S, Mahrholdt H. European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (EuroCMR) registry--multi national results from 57 centers in 15 countries. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Jan 18;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-9. PMID: 23331632; PMCID: PMC3564740.
Gebker R, Jahnke C, Manka R, et al. Additional value of myocardial perfusion imaging during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 1 (2): 122-130.
Smart SC, Knickelbine T, Malik F, Sagar KB. Ecocardiografía de estrés con dobutamina-atropina para la detección de enfermedad arterial coronaria en pacientes con hipertrofia ventricular izquierda. Importancia del tamaño de la cámara y la tensión sistólica de la pared. Circulación . 2000 ; 101 : 258-263.
Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M, Okinaka T, Isaka N, Nakano T, Takeda K. Noninfarcted myocardium: correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology. 2003 Oct;229(1):209-16. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2291021118. Epub 2003 Aug 27. PMID: 12944596.
Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Ferrari VA, Rademakers FE, Pellikka PA, Hundley WG, Poldermans D, Bax JJ, Wegscheider K, Fleck E, Nagel E. Determinación de la variabilidad interobservador para identificar anomalías inducibles del movimiento de la pared ventricular izquierda durante la resonancia magnética de estrés con dobutamina imágenes. Eur Heart J . 2006 ; 27 : 1459-1464. Study for evaluation of Chest Pain)Circulation 2017 ; 135: 2320-2332.
Plein S, Greenwood JP, Ridgway JP, Cranny G, Ball SG, Sivananthan MU. Assessment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Dec 7;44(11):2173-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.056. PMID: 15582315
Mordini FE, Haddad T, Hsu LY, Kellman P, Lowrey TB, Aletras AH, Bandettini WP, Arai AE. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jan;7(1):14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.08.014. PMID: 24433707; PMCID: PMC4186701.
Prenner BM, Bukofzer S, Behm S, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and tolerability of regadenoson in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2012; 19 (4): 681-692.
Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, Nandalur MR, Carlos RC. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 2;50(14):1343-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.030. Epub 2007 Sep 17. PMID: 17903634.
Hamon M, Fau G, Née G, Ehtisham J, Morello R, Hamon M. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010 May 19;12(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-29. PMID: 20482819; PMCID: PMC2890682.
Schwitter J, Wacker CM, van Rossum AC, Lombardi M, Al-Saadi N, Ahlstrom H, Dill T, Larsson HB, Flamm SD, Marquardt M, Johansson L. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2008 Feb;29(4):480-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm617. Epub 2008 Jan 21. PMID: 18208849.9.
Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N, Al-Saadi N, Sauer E, Huettle K, Schönberg SO, Luchner A, Strohm O, Ahlstrom H, Dill T, Hoebel N, Simor T; MR-IMPACT Investigators. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial. Eur Heart J. 2013 Mar;34(10):775-81. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs022. Epub 2012 Mar 4. PMID: 22390914.
Greenwood J, Maredia N, Younger J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. The Lancet 2012; 379 (9814): 453-460.
Ripley D, Brown J, Everett C, et al. Rationale and design of the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary heart disease 2 trial (CE-MARC 2): A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of diagnostic strategies in suspected coronary heart disease. American Heart Journal 2015; 169 (1): 17-24. e1.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance /cg95/resources/chest-pain-of-recent-onset -assessment-and-diagnosis-975751034821. Accessed August 16, 2016.
Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, Heidenreich PA, Henkin RE, Pellikka PA, Pohost GM, Williams KA; American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; American College of Radiology; American Heart Association; American Society of Echocardiography; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; Society of Nuclear Medicine. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Circulation. 2009 Jun 9;119(22):e561-87. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192519. Epub 2009 May 18. PMID: 19451357.
Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(10):886-895.
Pryor D B, Shaw L, Mc Cants B, et al. Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(2):81-90.
Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Protocols. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Oct 8;15(1):91. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-91. PMID: 24103764; PMCID: PMC3851953.
Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ, Desai MY, Mamuya W, Thomson L, Weigold WG. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009 May-Jun;3(3):190-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 Mar 31. PMID: 19409872..
Hesse B, Lindhardt TB, Acampa W, Anagnostopoulos C, Ballinger J, Bax JJ, Edenbrandt L, Flotats A, Germano G, Stopar TG, Franken P, Kelion A, Kjaer A, Le Guludec D, Ljungberg M, Maenhout AF, Marcassa C, Marving J, McKiddie F, Schaefer WM, Stegger L, Underwood R. EANM/ESC guidelines for radionuclide imaging of cardiac function. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Apr;35(4):851-85. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0694-9. PMID: 18224320.
Ripley DP, Brown JM, Everett CC, Bijsterveld P, Walker S, Sculpher M, McCann GP, Berry C, Plein S, Greenwood JP. Rationale and design of the Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary heart disease 2 trial (CE-MARC 2): a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of diagnostic strategies in suspected coronary heart disease. Am Heart J. 2015 Jan;169(1):17-24.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 22. PMID: 25497243; PMCID: PMC4277294.
Fleiss JL, Tytun A, Ury HK. A simple approximation for calculating sample sizes for comparing independent proportions. Biometrics. 1980 Jun;36(2):343-6. PMID: 26625475.
White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.4067. Epub 2010 Nov 30. PMID: 21225900.
Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York, NY:Wiley; 1987.
Thygesen K., Alpert JS, Jaffe AS. Tercera definición universal de infarto de miocardio. Circulación. 2012; 126 : 2020–2035
Goff DC Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D'Agostino RB, Gibbons R, Greenland P, Lackland DT, Levy D, O'Donnell CJ, Robinson JG, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC Jr, Sorlie P, Stone NJ, Wilson PW, Jordan HS, Nevo L, Wnek J, Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Curtis LH, DeMets D, Hochman JS, Kovacs RJ, Ohman EM, Pressler SJ, Sellke FW, Shen WK, Smith SC Jr, Tomaselli GF; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S49-73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98. Epub 2013 Nov 12. Erratum in: Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S74-5. PMID: 24222018.
Li M, Zhou T, Yang L, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Magnetic Resonance Perfusion to Diag- nose Ischemic Stenosis With Fractional Flow Reserve as Reference. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2014; 7 (11): 1.098-1.105.
Pontone G, Andreini D, Guaricci A, et al. The STRATEGY Study (Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for the Management of Symptomatic Revascularized Patients). Clinical perspective. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2016; 9 (10): e005171
Gargiulo P, Dellegrottaglie S, Bruzzese D, et al. The Prognostic Value of Normal Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2013; 6 (4): 574-582.
Hussain S, Paul M, Plein S, et al. Design and rationale of the MR-INFORM study: stress perfusion MRI to guide the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2012; 14 (Suppl 1): O19.
Greenwood JP,, Ripley DP, Berry C, McCann GP, Plein S, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Dall'Armellina E, Prasad A, Bijsterveld P, Foley JR, Mangion K, Sculpher M, Walker S, Everett CC, Cairns DA, Sharples LD, Brown JM; Effect of Care Guided by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy, or NICE Guidelines on Subsequent Unnecessary Angiography Rates: The CE-MARC 2 Randomized Clinical Trial CE-MARC 2 Investigators.JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1051-60. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.12680.PMID: 27570866
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Tanya Padilla Molina, Cristian Fierro Renoy, Geovanny Escorza Velez, Francisco Castro Vega, Doménica Bayas Padilla
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
