Calidad de vida relacionada a salud oral y general en  edéntulos totales rehabilitados con prótesis totales  mucosoportadas e implantosoportadas. Quito

María Fernanda Alarcón Larco; Sebastián Alejandro Alarcón Larco; Mariela Cumandá Balseca Ibarra; Kleber Arturo Vallejo Rosero

doi:10.47464/MetroCiencia/vol31/1/2023/14-22

Authors

María Fernanda Alarcón Larco Universidad Central del Ecuador https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-045X
Sebastián Alejandro Alarcón Larco Investigador Independiente https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1798-6112
Mariela Cumandá Balseca Ibarra Universidad Central del Ecuador https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7218-3622
Kleber Arturo Vallejo Rosero Universidad Central del Ecuador https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-7368

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47464/MetroCiencia/vol31/1/2023/14-22

Keywords:

Quality of Life, Dental prostheses, Dental implants, Edentulous Arch, Oral health, Surveys and questionnaires

Abstract

Totally edentulous patients should opt for the replacement of their missing teeth, since these treatments improve their quality of life. The therapy options that can be performed on them are: conventional total dentures and implant-supported ones. Objective: To compare the perception of the quality of life of oral health among totally edentulous patients rehabilitated with total tissue-supported prostheses or with implant-supported prostheses, which was carried out in the postgraduate clinics of the Faculty of Dentistry of the Central University of Ecuador, in the period 2019-2020. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional analytical observational study, in 24 totally edentulous patients who were rehabilitated with conventional and implant-supported total dentures, male and female. The sample was divided into two groups: G1: patients with implant-supported prostheses (n= 12), G2: patients with conventional full dentures (n= 12). The SF-36 questionnaire was completed in each group, which assessed their perception of quality of life related to their general health, and the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) questionnaire. The U Mann-Withey and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied with a significance level of 5%. Conclusions: Patients with implant-supported prostheses have a better perception of quality of life compared to patients with conventional total dentures, from the point of view of general and oral health, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

María Fernanda Alarcón Larco, Universidad Central del Ecuador

Docente de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Central del Ecuador; Quito, Ecuador
Sebastián Alejandro Alarcón Larco, Investigador Independiente

Médico; Investigador Independiente; Quito, Ecuador
Mariela Cumandá Balseca Ibarra, Universidad Central del Ecuador

Docente de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Central del Ecuador; Quito, Ecuador
Kleber Arturo Vallejo Rosero, Universidad Central del Ecuador

Docente de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Central del Ecuador; Quito, Ecuador

References

Cardona-Arias JA, Higuita-Gutiérrez LF. Applications of a WHO-designed instrument for the quality of life evaluation. Rev Cuba Salud Publica. 2014;40(2):175–89.

Botero de Mejía BE, Pico Merchán ME. Quality of Life Related to Health (QLRH) in Seniors over 60 Years of Age: A Theoretical Approach. Hacia la Promoción la Salud [Internet]. 2007;12(1):11–24. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-75772007000100002&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es

Bitiniene D, Zamaliauskiene R, Kubilius R, Leketas M, Gailius T, Smirnovaite K. Quality of life in patients with temporomandibular disorders. A systematic review. Stomatologija. 2018;20(1):3–9.

Sivaramakrishnan G, Sridharan K. Comparison of implant supported mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Aust Dent J. 2016;61(4):482–8.

Versión I. Investigación Oral Brasileña convencional y la sobredentadura en la calidad de vida y la eficiencia masticatoria. 2020;1–8.

Alves AC, Cavalcanti RV, Calderon PS, Pernambuco L, Alchieri JC. Quality of life related to complete denture. Acta Odontol Latinoam [Internet]. 2018;31(2):91–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30383072

Al Deeb M, Abduljabbar T, Vohra F, Zafar MS, Hussain M. Assessment of factors influencing oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with removable dental prosthesis. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2020;36(2):213–8.

Dantas I de S, de Souza MBC, Morais MH de ST, Carreiro A da FP, Barbosa GAS. Success and survival rates of mandibular overdentures supported by two or four implants: A systematic review. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28(1):74–80.

Biol O, Res C, Paul A, Simon S, Kumar S, Cmch C, et al. Evaluación de las percepciones de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud bucal en pacientes con implantes dentales . Experiencia de un centro de atención terciaria en India. 2020;8(2):74–7.

Sivaramakrishnan G. Comparison of implant supported mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. 2016;482–8.

Issn VO, Julie A. Investigación Oral Brasileña percibido por los pacientes después de la transición a sobredentaduras mandibulares. 2020;1–9.

Relacionada I, Filius MAP, Vissink A, Cune MS, Raghoebar GM. Efecto de la terapia con implantes sobre la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud bucal ( OHIP ‐ 49 ), el estado de salud ( SF ‐ 36 ) y la satisfacción de los pacientes con varios dientes genéticos : estudio de cohorte prospectivo. 2020;20(Ohip 49):592–7.

Iurov II, Vorsanova SG, Solov’ev I V., Iurov IB. [Original molecular cytogenetic approach to determining spontaneous chromosomal mutations in the interphase cells to evaluate the mutagenic activity of environmental factors]. Gig Sanit. 2011;(5):90–4.

Mulet García M, Hidalgo Hidalgo S, Díaz Gómez S. Salud bucal en pacientes portadores de prótesis: etapa diagnóstica. Rev Arch Médico Camagüey. 2006;10(5):34–43.

Alpi SV. Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud. Rev Colomb Cancerol. 2010;14(4):187–8.

Deeb M Al, Abduljabbar T, Vohra F, Zafar MS, Hussain M. Evaluación de los factores que influyen en la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud bucodental ( OHRQoL ) de pacientes con prótesis dental removible. 2020;36(2):213–8.

Sivaramakrishnan G, Sridharan K. Resumen Métodos Resultados Conclusiones Introducción Métodos Fuentes de información y estrategia de búsqueda. 2020;1–15.

Alzarea BK. Evaluación y evaluación de la calidad de vida ( OHRQoL ) de pacientes con implantes dentales mediante el perfil de impacto en la salud bucal ( OHIP- 14 ): un estudio clínico. 2020;10(4):1–8.

Inukai M, John MT, Igarashi Y, Baba K. Association between perceived chewing ability and oral health-related quality of life in partially dentate patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:1–6.

Sharma AJ, Nagrath R, Pradesh U, Chattikara PO, Pradesh U. Una evaluación comparativa de la eficiencia de masticación , la fuerza de mordida masticatoria y la satisfacción del paciente entre la dentadura postiza convencional y la sobredentadura mandibular soportada por implantes : un estudio in vivo. 2020;17(4):361–72.

Feine J, Abou-Ayash S, Al Mardini M, de Santana RB, Bjelke-Holtermann T, Bornstein MM, et al. Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: Patient-reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(May):270–5.

LASTNAME F. Art 10. Vol. 108, Test. 2017. p. 0–0.